From collection Ludwig von Mises Collection

Page 1

Page 2
Search
results in pages
Metadata
Liberals Opposed to Nazism Newspaper Clipping, November 19, 1944
Liberals Opposed to Nazism
Those in Austria Regarded as Against
Totalitarian Movement
To THE EDITOR OF THE NEW YORK TIMES:
In the letter by the Rev. Thomas A.
Michels, published in your issue of Sept.
15, we are told that in Austria "most
of the liberals-in the European sense
of the term-were not only not opposed
to nazism but favored it openly or
cryptically."
This is, I think, a misstatement, not
only with regard to that small group
of politicians who followed in the foot-
steps of great liberals like Prof. Unger
or Franz Klein, but misleading in so far
as there was no Liberal party in the
Austrian Reichsrat and the liberals of
either the Socialist or the Christian
Socialist party cannot be justly accused
of favoring nazism.
This misstatement is obviously due
to the confounding of liberalism and
anti-clericalism. It would have been ex-
cusable in the nineteenth century, when
Pope Pius IX issued his encyclical "Si
quis dixerit" against the liberal enemies
of the Catholic Church. It is, however,
inadmissible today when liberal Cath-
olics in France and in Italy were and
are waging a gallant and intrepid war
against nazism and fascism.
It is similarly misleading to identify
the forerunners of nazism in Austria,
the Grossdeutsch (the Greater Ger-
many) party with liberalism. Ritter
von Schoenerer or Schober were as
little liberal as Bismarck or the Kaiser
himself. And although it is none of my
business to defend the memory of Mgr.
Seipel against Father Michels, it seems
to me unfair to mention him and Doll-
fuss as equal champions of Austrian
independence. Chancellor Seipel was a
highly cultured statesman of European
size who did his best to strengthen
Austrian democracy, while Dollfuss did
his best to destroy it by aping Musso-
lini's corporative state and by anni-
hilating all Socialist achievements. His
tragic resistance proved of as little
avail as the "courageous letter" sent
by Otto of Austria from Belgian
safety, challenging 200,000 Austrian
veterans to offer armed resistance to
75,000,000 Germans. It may be of use
to cry over spilled milk, but it is of
little use to back up with this liquid
Habsburg ambitions.
RUSTEM VAMBERY.
New York, Sept. 16, 1944.
Viewer Controls
Toggle Page Navigator
P
Toggle Hotspots
H
Toggle Readerview
V
Toggle Search Bar
S
Toggle Viewer Info
I
Toggle Metadata
M
Zoom-In
+
Zoom-Out
-
Re-Center Document
Previous Page
←
Next Page
→
Liberals Opposed to Nazism Newspaper Clipping, November 19, 1944
Details
11/19/1944