Memorandum from LAWRENCE FERTIG Dear Lu and Margit: Bertha and I are happy to know that you are up in the clean pure air of New England instead of being in smoggy New York. We have had rain, fog and quite a bit of smog for a few days here and we hope the weather will change next weekend when we'll have a lot of visitors at Sands Point for our tennis tournament. Not too much news here. I had lunch with Harry the other day. He seems in good spirits (although at times quite excited and nervous about the current situation. I guess that's Harry's nature and he cannot change). I enclose for your delight an editorial from the Chicago Tribune which is one of the best I have seen in a long, long time. I hope it's commented on in the National Review and other journals. In the current National Review Bulletin there is a brief statement comparing the predictions of the pollsters in the Oregon and California primaries with the actual results in those two states. The margin of error for the pollsters is really very great. I wrote to my friend Martin Anderson, who is now working full time for Nixon and told him that these statistics should be sent out to every delegate to the Republican national convention. They prove how wrong the pollsters can be, and Rockefeller's campaign will depend upon the pollsters' reports in July and August. If the polls show him far ahead he expects to bludgeon the delegates into nominating him. I don't think it will happen, but the report in National Review should be a convincing argument to the delegates to be aware of the pollsters. I am quite busy these days working on the dinner for Leonard Read. The response to our original letter which asks many of our friends whether they would